|
Type Design makes competitive fonts, allowing users to make informed choices on what fonts to use. On the left is DMCA Sans Serif (publicdomain), on the right are the commercial fonts by LucasFonts.
On the left is old version of Fairfax (named [REDACTED] as a parody of RebeccaRGB’s censoring of competitors), on the right is the upcoming Custom Font ttf 5.0. (current Fairfax has different slopes but still bad slopes) ![]() Here is a comparison of a professional document typesetting in DMCA Sans Serif and Riglos. DMCA Sans Serif: Riglos: The following images demonstrate design flaws in Kreative fonts ([REDACTED]=Fairfax, Full HD [REDACTED]=Fairfax HD, [REDACTED] square=Kreative Square). The red text describes how to bugfix the design flaws. In TrueType, you cannot exceed the font height vertically, or else it will get clipped. RebeccaRGB drew light diagonal box drawing characters with the perpendicular line cap, which might seem cute from a geometrical standpoint, but it is unusable in typography since it gets clipped: ![]() The “Modular Font Elements” are actually FontStruct tiles, and they can actually be flipped horizontally and/or vertically and/or rotated at an angle of 90° or −90° even though such possibilities are not in Kreative Square. (Worse yet, RebeccaRGB’s suggested solution was to manually transform the tiles in an image editor, in which case you shouldn’t even be using any fonts/text in the first place since that is not a valid typographical operation) ![]() The diagonal fill patterns are chequer patterns in Fairfax, therefore the direction is uncertain. However, Fairfax HD and Kreative Square have diagonals (though not all of them tile properly). RebeccaRGB made claims of these characters being checker patterns but that is clearly not the case, as it is evident that they are supposed to be diagonals. ![]() The 1FB81 character is not composed correctly. It doesn’t matter that Kreative claims to be ‘authority’ (whatever that means), it doesn’t match the character name. ![]() The left/right quarters (that are chequered) are inconsistent with top/bottom eighths (that are rounded). ![]() The superscripts in Unicode and in private use are inconsistent. It isn't a private use issue though, as it is the Unicode superscripts that deviate in Fairfax. ![]() The Legacy Computing diagonal fill patterns aren’t 1÷2 of the area in Fairfax. (in actual legacy computing, diagonal fill patterns take half area) ![]() The intersection in the mixed tables in ╫ and ╪ is useless. It doesn’t matter what the majority of the fonts do. ![]() This is what the character tables would look like if there was a table for every style, except there isn’t — only the Regular exists. ![]() Contact Piotr Grochowski below if you want to request a comparison of any of the fonts of Type Design with your font. (not all comparisons on this page were by request) Here is a comparison between Custom Font ttf and Riglos in the Subset2 character set: Here is a comparison between Fairfax and Riglos: ![]() Here is a comparison between Riglos Mono (monospaced) and Riglos (proportional): Name: Piotr Grochowski E-mail: piotrunio-2004@wp.pl AnyDesk: 265 993 303 Widget is loading comments...
|